ASI2600MC Pro vs ASI2600MC Air

What would be the better choice from a technical standpoint: ASIAIR + ASI2600MC Pro + separate guide camera versus the ASI2600MC Air (all-in-one solution)?

I am already aware of the trade-offs related to cost and the potential single point of failure (SPoF) in the all-in-one setup. My interest is primarily in understanding the technical advantages and disadvantages of each option, particularly in terms of guiding performance, reliability, flexibility, cable management, upgradeability, and overall imaging experience.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

1 Like
  1. Single Point Of Failure like you stated
  2. You cannot upgrade any one system individually. If you want a more powerful controller, or just more storage, or more USB ports - you cannot - the ASIAir is built into this
  3. The sensor for guiding is on the same position as the imaging camera. This means that if you use a strong filter, it will receive lesser light and make guiding more difficult.
  4. I also believe you need a large imaging circle that is properly corrected for the guiding to work properly.
1 Like

1 and 2 as stated by you and Siva. It will be easy to use, excellent cable management, good imaging experience etc.

  1. Adding to Siva’s pointers, the integrated guiding camera comes after the filter, which you will have to use (mostly) for anything other than broadband imaging. It comes with a 4um pixel pitch which should be sufficient for anything around 800mm FL IG. However, folks go for the ASI174mm-class guide scopes for longer FL. They have larger sensors (1/2” rather than the 1/8” on the integrated camera) for a larger FOV for finding stars and larger pixel size of 5.86mm which helps a lot at long FLs (large pixels are generally more sensitive to light which is what we want for guiding).

ASI120mm mini guide cam / ASI224MC cam have 3.75um pixels with 1.3” sensor size. ASI220mm mini and the integrated guiding cam in the Air come with 4um pixels and 1/1.8” sensor size, which is a tradeoff. The ASI174MM-class guiders come with even larger pixel size with 5.86um pixel size and 1/1.2” sensor size with a wider FoV.

All these cameras with different sizes may work in most focal lengths as long as the sky condition allows it. However, most of the times, we need to have the max sensitivity and FoV that we can afford so that guiding works as it should.

1 Like